Personal tools

Argument: The state should not impose a religious choice

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting Quotes

  • The Economist "The case for gay marriage" 2/26/04 - "It is no business of the state to impose a religious choice. Indeed, in America the constitution expressly bans the involvement of the state in religious matters, so it would be especially outrageous if the constitution were now to be used for religious ends [that aim to ban gay marriage]."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits