Argument: Water privatization is at odds with the need to conserve water resources - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships Facebook group getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Donate! Other resources Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Join Debatepedia's Facebook group! \| News: Next on Debate Digest: War on Drugs See Debatepedia's resources for the Spring 2010 The People Speak Global Debates on climate change adaptation Argument: Water privatization is at odds with the need to conserve water resources From Debatepedia (Redirected from Argument:Water privatization is at odds with the need to conserve water resources) Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate:Water Privatisation Resolved: Water should be considered national property [Edit] Supporting evidence "Water: to privatize or not to privatize". The South Asian. February 27, 2004 - "Can water privatization and water conservation co-exist? There are fundamental conflicts of interests between the objectives of water conservation and privatization. Private companies are answerable to their shareholders and the primary objective for any venture is profits. The profits are directly proportional to the amount of water consumed. Thus, the incentive for the private company is to maximize consumption of water. This incentive is in direct opposition to the aims of conservation of water." Retrieved from "http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Water_privatization_is_at_odds_with_the_need_to_conserve_water_resources"

Problem with the site?

.