Argument: Banning one class of arms does not violate an individual right to bear arms

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships Facebook group getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Donate! Other resources Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Join Debatepedia's Facebook group! \| News: Next on Debate Digest: War on Drugs See Debatepedia's resources for the Spring 2010 The People Speak Global Debates on climate change adaptation Argument: Banning one class of arms does not violate an individual right to bear arms From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate:DC handgun ban [Edit] Supporting quotes Oral arguments in DC vs. Heller. March 19th, 2008 - "CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: What is -- what is reasonable about a total ban on possession? MR. DELLINGER: What is reasonable about a total ban on possession is that it's a ban only an the possession of one kind of weapon, of handguns, that's been considered especially -- especially dangerous." Retrieved from "http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Banning_one_class_of_arms_does_not_violate_an_individual_right_to_bear_arms"

Problem with the site?

Parent debate