Argument: Ecotourism does not preserve but damages local cultures

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Featured articles Upcoming features Contents guide getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Twitter Donate! Other resources Contact Internships Facebook group Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal. Argument: Ecotourism does not preserve but damages local cultures From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate: Ecotourism [Edit] Supporting evidence Anita Pleumarom. "Eco-tourism or Eco-terrorism?" Sustainable Tourism. 1995 - "Romantic devastation Eco-tourism's claim that it preserves and enhances local cultures is highly insincere. Ethnic groups are viewed as a major asset in attracting visitors; an `exotic' backdrop to natural scenery and wildlife. The simultaneous romanticism and devastation of indigenous cultures is one of eco- tourism's ironies." Retrieved from "http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Ecotourism_does_not_preserve_but_damages_local_cultures"

Problem with the site?

Parent debate