Personal tools

Argument: Gun prohibition movement has historically failed in the U.S

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent Debate

Supporting Evidence

  • David Kopel , “Gun Prohibitionists Mostly Misfire”, on November 21, 2007 "The citizens of Massachusetts, also in 1976, were asked by referendum whether to ban handguns. The left-leaning state had been the only one to vote for George McGovern in the previous presidential election. The "People vs. Handguns" campaign was "supported by most of the state's press," according to Time Magazine. But 69 percent of Massachusetts voters rejected it.
Gun prohibitionists tried again in California in 1982, proposing a "handgun freeze," allowing current owners to keep their handguns but banning any new acquisitions. The measure was crushed by a vote of 63-37 percent. The freeze's opponents brought so many additional voters to the polls that they even carried Republican George Deukmejian to a narrow, 1-percent victory over Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley in the governor's race.
The gun-prohibition movement successfully lobbied the Chicago suburb of Morton Grove, Ill., to ban handguns in 1981. Chicago itself followed suit in 1983, and the suburbs of Evanston, Oak Park, and Wilmette also enacted handgun bans. The Chicagoland bans got a lot of press, and the national backlash against them was powerful. State after state passed preemption laws, forbidding localities from banning handguns.
By the early 1990s, local handgun bans had been outlawed almost everywhere in the United States. One of the few states without a preemption law was Wisconsin. Yet even in left-leaning cities in the state, handgun prohibition was rejected

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits