Argument: Landmines can be deployed judiciously with 0 risk to citizens

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships Facebook group getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Donate! Other resources Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Join Debatepedia's Facebook group! \| News: Next on Debate Digest: War on Drugs See Debatepedia's resources for the Spring 2010 The People Speak Global Debates on climate change adaptation Argument: Landmines can be deployed judiciously with 0 risk to citizens From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate:Mine Ban Treaty (Ottawa Treaty) [Edit] Supporting quotations Jim Coles 3d, a civilian spokesman for the 37,000 American troops in South Korea - "The use of mines here is extensive but judicious, aimed at preventing breakthroughs and not just at blowing people up."[1] Retrieved from "http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Landmines_can_be_deployed_judiciously_with_0_risk_to_citizens"

Problem with the site?

Parent debate