Argument: Marijuana possession is not an offense that warrants criminal procedures

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships Facebook group getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Donate! Other resources Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Join Debatepedia's Facebook group! \| News: Next on Debate Digest: War on Drugs See Debatepedia's resources for the Spring 2010 The People Speak Global Debates on climate change adaptation Argument: Marijuana possession is not an offense that warrants criminal procedures From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate:Decriminalizing marijuana possession, making it a civil offense [Edit] Supporting evidence In 1972 the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse concluded, "The Commission is of the unanimous opinion that marihuana use is not such a grave problem that individuals who smoke marihuana, or possess it for that purpose, should be subject to criminal procedures."[1] Retrieved from "http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Marijuana_possession_is_not_an_offense_that_warrants_criminal_procedures"

Problem with the site?

Parent debate