Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Offering plea bargains in exchange for testimony creates an incentive for faulty testimony

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

YOU CAN BECOME AN EDITOR OF THIS PAGE. DEBATEPEDIA IS A WIKI THAT ANYONE CAN EDIT! BE BOLD, CLICK EDIT, AND HELP MAKE THIS PAGE INTO A VALUABLE PUBLIC RESOURCE THAT THOUSANDS WILL READ. SEE THE GETTING STARTED TUTORIAL.

Argument's parent debate

Supporting evidence

  • Chicago Law School Study - A study conducted in 1997 by the Univeristy Of Chicago Law School deemed based on over 10,000 cases analyzed in which plea bargaining took place in exchange for testimony, 23% of criminals testimony's were in at least one way false.
  • Federal Criminal Law: Expediency Over Principle. William L. Anderson. 2/22/2005 - "when nearly all of the witnesses against [Richard Scrushy] are co-workers who were facing decades in prison for 'committing' such 'derivative crimes' as 'wire fraud,' 'mail fraud,' and 'money laundering,' and who were able to bargain down their sentences to a few years of incarceration, it becomes difficult to ascertain what part of their testimony may be true, and what part false."

Counter-arguments

but you have to use common sense when dealing with plea bargaining that people will be dishonest and that they will not tell the truth

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.