Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Outlawing Holocaust denial risks revisionists being called "deniers"

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Robin Davis. "Holocaust Denial and Uncomfortable Truths". Countercurrents.org. June 6th, 2009: "The real threat posed by "deniers" is that others might be influenced to undertake serious study and uncover embarrassing facts that would refute Israel's "victim" status. This would threaten Israel's moral legitimacy, underpinned by the world's collective shame for looking the other way. All it takes to invoke that shame is the term anti-Semite, either stated or implied.

But opinions that question the widely accepted WWII Jewish genocide history are not anti-Semitic any more than opinions that question the accepted history of the Ukraine genocide (1) are anti-Russian. That we are led to label any deviation from the official history as "Holocaust denial" and "Holocaust denial" as anti-Semitism is no accident. It has come about by the same semantic sleight of hand that would have us believe anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism are one and the same. They are not"

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.