Argument: The 2nd Amendment does not express a right to bear arms for self-defense - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships Facebook group getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Donate! Other resources Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Join Debatepedia's Facebook group! \| News: Debate Digest: Gay marriage See Debatepedia's resources for the Spring 2010 The People Speak Global Debates on climate change adaptation Argument: The 2nd Amendment does not express a right to bear arms for self-defense From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debates Debate:DC handgun ban Debate:US Second Amendment [Edit] Supporting quotes Spitzer. "Lost and Found: Researching the Second Amendment". 1998 - "...the matter of personal or individual self-defense, whether from wild animals or modern-day predators, does not fall within, nor is it dependent on, the Second Amendment rubric. Nothing in the history, construction, or interpretation of the Amendment applies or infers such a protection. Rather, legal protection for personal self-defense arises from the British common law tradition and modern criminal law; not from constitutional law." Retrieved from "http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_The_2nd_Amendment_does_not_express_a_right_to_bear_arms_for_self-defense"

Problem with the site?

.