Argument: The DC gun ban does not violate 2nd amendment because DC is not a state

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships Facebook group getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Donate! Other resources Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Join Debatepedia's Facebook group! \| News: Next on Debate Digest: War on Drugs See Debatepedia's resources for the Spring 2010 The People Speak Global Debates on climate change adaptation Argument: The DC gun ban does not violate 2nd amendment because DC is not a state From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent Debate Should handguns be banned in Washington DC? [Edit] Supporting Evidence Major ruling against D.C. handgun ban In 2-1 vote, appeals court says Second Amendment is not limited to ‘militia’ "Judge Karen Henderson dissented, writing that the Second Amendment does not apply to the District of Columbia because it is not a state. " Retrieved from "http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_The_DC_gun_ban_does_not_violate_2nd_amendment_because_DC_is_not_a_state"

Problem with the site?

Parent Debate