Personal tools

Argument: There is no evidence that GM foods are unsafe

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

"The real GM food scandal". Prospect. November 2007 - "The fact is that there is not a shred of any evidence of risk to human health from GM crops. Every academy of science, representing the views of the world's leading experts—the Indian, Chinese, Mexican, Brazilian, French and American academies as well as the Royal Society, which has published four separate reports on the issue—has confirmed this. Independent inquiries have found that the risk from GM crops is no greater than that from conventionally grown crops that do not have to undergo such testing. In 2001, the research directorate of the EU commission released a summary of 81 scientific studies financed by the EU itself—not by private industry—conducted over a 15-year period, to determine whether GM products were unsafe or insufficiently tested: none found evidence of harm to humans or to the environment.

Former UK environment secretary, David Miliband, has said that there is no evidence that organic food is more nutritious than conventionally grown food.[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits