Join Debatepedia's Facebook group! | News: Next on Debate Digest: War on Drugs
See Debatepedia's resources for the Spring 2010 The People Speak Global Debates on climate change adaptation
Argument: US and NATO humanitarian military interventions bring their own set of atrocities
From Debatepedia
[Edit]
Parent debate(s)
[Edit]
The case of NATO in Kosovo in 1999
- Lance Selfa. "Can U.S. military intervention ever bring justice?." Socialist Worker.org. May 19, 2006 - "There were about 45,000 refugees when the war began. By its end, there were 800,000. Less than 10 percent of the total war expenditure was spent on refugees, with the rest--about $4 billion--spent on bombing Yugoslavia.
- More than 16,000 NATO troops patrol the province today. Nevertheless, NATO has stood by repeatedly while Albanian extremists harassed and murdered ethnic Serbs. Thousands of UN and NGO nation-builders provide the only stable source of employment in the province. While thousands of Kosovars remained homeless, the U.S. military finished building its permanent Camp Bondsteel headquarters in 2000.
- LET’S KEEP all of this in mind when we hear U.S. officials pledge that they are concerned about stopping 'genocide' in Darfur. Since when has the U.S. gone to war without proclaiming some lofty and idealistic-sounding reason for it?"
[Edit]
Counter-argument
[Edit]
See also
[Edit]
External links
[Edit]



