Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

Views

Search

getting started

Other resources

Toolbox

Join Debatepedia's Facebook group! | News: Next on Debate Digest: War on Drugs
See Debatepedia's resources for the Spring 2010 The People Speak Global Debates on climate change adaptation

Debate: Court appointed-attorneys

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

[

Digg

]

[

reddit

]

[

Delicious

]

[

]

Do indigent defendants receive adequate defense counsel on ever single case

Background and context

[Edit] [] [] [] [] Write Subquestion here...
[] [Edit] Yes Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here	[] [Edit] No Court-appointed attorneys are biased toward good will of judges. Steve Brewer and Mike Tolson. "Court-Appointed Defense: Critics Charge the System Is Unfair". Houston Chronicle. 7 Feb. 2001 - "The system's critics charge that the practice of having judges appoint counsel to the poor inevitably compromises the independence of the lawyer chosen and is susceptible to whim and favoritism. Lawyers become dependent on the goodwill of judges, the critics say, and avoid trial behavior or strategies, perhaps unconsciously, that might anger the person signing their checks."
[Edit] [] [] [] [] [] Write Subquestion here...
[] [Edit] Yes Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here	[] [Edit] No Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
[Edit] [] [] [] [] Pro/con sources
[] [Edit] Yes Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here	[] [Edit] No Steve Brewer and Mike Tolson. "Court-Appointed Defense: Critics Charge the System Is Unfair". Houston Chronicle. 7 Feb. 2001
[Edit] References:
[Edit] Related pages on Debatepedia:
[Edit] External links and resources:

Retrieved from "http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Court_appointed-attorneys"

Categories: Law | Courts | Attorneys

Problem with the site?

.