Personal tools
 
Views

Debatepedia:Editing tasks

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

We are trying to expand our system by which we involve readers and volunteers in the tasks that lie before us. This section is dedicated to those ongoing as well as day-to-day tasks that you can help with.

Articles that could use your help

See longer lists of editing tasks at the top of each article. Keep in mind, it is helpful to think about what needs doing in the context of what we are aiming for in each article. We are trying to achieve the most comprehensive documentation of the primary pro and con arguments in a public debate. Refer to the abortion debate article for a greater understanding of what this looks like, and the direction we need to be moving each article.

See also Category:Underdeveloped debates.

On-going, important editorial tasks

See the 'Editing tasks and things you can do' section on Debatepedia's main page

On a semi-daily basis, the Underdeveloped debate section on the main page should be updated now. For editoral tasks that

a) are the most interesting

and

b) need your help to edit them,

see this section for regularly updated editoral tasks.

Be a part of the Debatepedia community and start editing now!

Editorial skimming of Daily Debate Digest debates

Roughly every day, we publish on the Main Page's Daily Debate Digest a debate that is very good. BUT, BUT, BUT, we do this very quickly, as we are trying to build content at a rapid pace, and make plenty of mistakes. If you are willing to read these articles, search for mistakes, and click edit and correct them when you see them, that would be great, and would be highly valuable to the site.

Help publish a debate in the Daily Debate Digest

If you want to put your editorial efforts to high-impact use (where lots of people will read your work), one thing you can do is help publish on the Daily Debate Digest. You should go to the Daily Debate Digest Publishing Calendar, see what's coming up, and see what you can help with. You can put your name under one of those debates too, and "sign-up". You should prepare to help meet the deadline for publishing that debate on the Daily Debate Digest, and you can get ahold of Brooks Lindsay (Debatepedia:Contact), the editor of the site, to coordinate efforts.

Build debate background sections

Many debates lack background sections, or at least good ones. These are very important to introducing a topic. The way we've been doing this is to provide in one paragraph a brief introduction to the history of the debate and the context. In the second paragraph we've been presenting an overview of the questions that frame the debate and that readers should expect to answer in their deliberations. See the following example. http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Debate:Clinton_vs._Obama#No These backgrounds are particularly needed in the Past Daily Debate Digest topics.

Build pro/con argument summaries

Realizing that many people want a distilled overview of arguments, we are opening pro/con argument summary sections at the top of debate pages. This is a great way to jump in, particularly because there are so many debates up with masses of arguments, but that badly lack this kind of pro/con summary.

Linking argument pages with counter-argument pages

You can open a section at the bottom of argument pages that creates a link (via the wiki code of [[ ]]) to a counter-argument. This makes it easier for readers to jump between arguments and counter-arguments.

Pro/con resources sections

Pro/con resource sections are an important part of any given debate page. They are the starting point for building debate articles, containing the main pro/con resources from which we can draw arguments, evidence, and quotes. Therefore, building a pro/con section list is a great way to get involved in helping the Debatepedia community. Check out the pro/con resources section at the bottom of this article: Debate: Withdrawing from Iraq as a guide of what it should look like. Click edit on it to view the formatting and coding for making hyperlinks. Emulate this when you create a pro/con resources section in another debate where it is needed.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.