Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: By not signing Ottawa Treaty, US encourages landmine use

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 03:25, 22 July 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (18:34, 16 June 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate:Mine Ban Treaty (Ottawa Treaty)]]+*[[Debate: Mine Ban Treaty (Ottawa Treaty)]]
- +
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==
'''Gina Coplon-Newfield, Coordinator of the USCBL.''' - "US refusal to join this treaty sets a dangerous, isolationist example to mine-using countries such as Russia, India, and Pakistan that have laid hundreds of thousands of mines in recent years with devastating consequences to civilians."[http://www.commondreams.org/news2004/0227-07.htm] '''Gina Coplon-Newfield, Coordinator of the USCBL.''' - "US refusal to join this treaty sets a dangerous, isolationist example to mine-using countries such as Russia, India, and Pakistan that have laid hundreds of thousands of mines in recent years with devastating consequences to civilians."[http://www.commondreams.org/news2004/0227-07.htm]

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Gina Coplon-Newfield, Coordinator of the USCBL. - "US refusal to join this treaty sets a dangerous, isolationist example to mine-using countries such as Russia, India, and Pakistan that have laid hundreds of thousands of mines in recent years with devastating consequences to civilians."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.