Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Prisoners are unfit for society so unfit to vote

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:12, 26 October 2010 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (21:12, 26 October 2010) (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate: Prisoner right to vote]] - con argument.+*[[Debate: Prisoners right to vote]] - con argument.
- +
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==
UK Shadow home secretary Ann Widdecombe said in 2001, "The courts have ruled that convicted prisoners, many of them dangerous, cannot be allowed to take part in normal society. How, therefore, can it be sensible to give them a say in how that society should be run?"[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1233084.stm] UK Shadow home secretary Ann Widdecombe said in 2001, "The courts have ruled that convicted prisoners, many of them dangerous, cannot be allowed to take part in normal society. How, therefore, can it be sensible to give them a say in how that society should be run?"[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1233084.stm]

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

UK Shadow home secretary Ann Widdecombe said in 2001, "The courts have ruled that convicted prisoners, many of them dangerous, cannot be allowed to take part in normal society. How, therefore, can it be sensible to give them a say in how that society should be run?"[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.