Personal tools

Argument: Some negative externalities from eco-tourism are ok

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 15:37, 14 June 2010; Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

  • Coburn Isaacs. "The limited potential of ecotourism to contribute to wildlife conservation". 2000 - "The existence of negative externalities does not mean that ecotourism is necessarily detrimental. Indeed, ecotourism is likely to be less damaging to the environment than alternative industries like agriculture, mining, timber, and urban development (Poirier 1997)."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits