Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: The death penalty is barbaric and uncharacteristic of a decent society

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 23:24, 1 July 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting quotations)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 00:24, 2 July 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting quotations)
Next diff →
Line 16: Line 16:
'''Victor Hugo. National Constituant Assembly of the French Republic. 15 September 1848.''' - Death penalty is the special and eternal sign of barbarism. Where death penalty is applied, barbarism dominates; where death penalty is rare, civilisation reigns.[http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Capital_punishment] '''Victor Hugo. National Constituant Assembly of the French Republic. 15 September 1848.''' - Death penalty is the special and eternal sign of barbarism. Where death penalty is applied, barbarism dominates; where death penalty is rare, civilisation reigns.[http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Capital_punishment]
 +
 +
 +'''Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney General, from his book "Crime in America", New York Times, 7/3/1968.''' - Capital punishment is the element from which war, genocide, holocaust multiply. If we cannot end the death penalty, the superior capacity for violence will continue its reign over reason, freedom, and love ... Worldwide acceptance of the commandment "government shalt not kill", will be a major milestone in the long road from barbarism.[http://freenet-homepage.de/dpinfo/prosecutors.htm]

Revision as of 00:24, 2 July 2008

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Rudolph J. Gerber, Judge of the Arizona State Court of Appeals. - To support the death penalty as sound social policy strikes me as grossly misguided. Not only does the death penalty not deter murder, it fosters a culture of brutality, risks international condemnation, and transforms our country into a brutal pariah.[1]


Abner Mikva, former Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. (2002) - The more that variations on the theme are scrutinized, the more obvious it is that the real reason for executing people is the oldest of reasons: revenge, anger at the felon, the somewhat flawed interpretation of the biblical "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth." But if that is the real reason for remaining outside the fold of all Western nations who have reformed away the death penalty, then why don't we acknowledge this thorn in our legal system by its appropriate name? We should admit that we engage in legalized murder.[2]


Leah J. Sears, Georgia Supreme Court Justice (2001) - Electrocution offends the evolving standards of decency that characterize a mature, civilized society.[3]


John Paul Stevens, U.S. Supreme Court Justice - The practice of executing such offenders is a relic of the past and is inconsistent with evolving standards of decency in a civilized society. We should put an end to this shameful practice.[4]


Victor Hugo. National Constituant Assembly of the French Republic. 15 September 1848. - Death penalty is the special and eternal sign of barbarism. Where death penalty is applied, barbarism dominates; where death penalty is rare, civilisation reigns.[5]


Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney General, from his book "Crime in America", New York Times, 7/3/1968. - Capital punishment is the element from which war, genocide, holocaust multiply. If we cannot end the death penalty, the superior capacity for violence will continue its reign over reason, freedom, and love ... Worldwide acceptance of the commandment "government shalt not kill", will be a major milestone in the long road from barbarism.[6]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.