Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Argument: The death penalty is merely a vehicle for vengeance
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 02:31, 2 July 2008 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (17:20, 22 April 2010) (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (→Parent debate) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Parent debate== | ==Parent debate== | ||
| - | *[[Debate:Capital Punishment]] | + | *[[Debate: Death penalty]] |
| - | + | ||
| ==Supporting quotations== | ==Supporting quotations== | ||
| '''Janet Reno, former U.S. Attorney General, 2005.''' - The only reason I can argue for the death penalty is vengeance. I do not think vengeance is a luxury the government can engage in.[http://freenet-homepage.de/dpinfo/prosecutors.htm] | '''Janet Reno, former U.S. Attorney General, 2005.''' - The only reason I can argue for the death penalty is vengeance. I do not think vengeance is a luxury the government can engage in.[http://freenet-homepage.de/dpinfo/prosecutors.htm] | ||
Current revision
[Edit]
Parent debate
[Edit]
Supporting quotations
Janet Reno, former U.S. Attorney General, 2005. - The only reason I can argue for the death penalty is vengeance. I do not think vengeance is a luxury the government can engage in.[1]
