Argument: US action in Libya is morally legitimate
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
- Debate: US and NATO intervention in Libya - pro argument.
Obama Administration letter to Congress justifying Libya engagement, June 15, 2011: "The United States and its international partners acted decisively and with unprecedented speed to mobilize a broad coalition, secure an international mandate to protect civilians, stop an advancing army, prevent a massacre, and establish a nofly zone. In contrast, the war in Bosnia raged for nearly two years before the first NATO military operations took place, and three years before NATO began ground strikes to protect the civilian population."