Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Ex-felon right to vote
From Debatepedia
Revision as of 05:06, 13 May 2008 (edit) Matthew.graham26 (Talk | contribs) (Debate:ex-felons vote moved to Debate:Ex-felon's right to vote: More fitting title) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 18:25, 13 May 2008 (edit) Jane37 (Talk | contribs) (→Yes) Next diff → |
||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
====Yes==== | ====Yes==== | ||
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | ||
- | * Petersilia, Joan. <u>When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry</u>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. | ||
* Krajick, Kevin. "Why Can't Ex-Felons Vote?"<u>The Washington Post </u> 18 Aug. 2003 | * Krajick, Kevin. "Why Can't Ex-Felons Vote?"<u>The Washington Post </u> 18 Aug. 2003 | ||
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9785-2004Aug17.html>. | <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9785-2004Aug17.html>. | ||
+ | * Petersilia, Joan. <u>When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry</u>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. | ||
* Uggan, Christopher, and Jeff Manza. 2001. "The Political Consequences of Felon Disenfranchisement Law in the United States." Washington, D.C.: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C. 12-14 August. | * Uggan, Christopher, and Jeff Manza. 2001. "The Political Consequences of Felon Disenfranchisement Law in the United States." Washington, D.C.: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C. 12-14 August. | ||
Revision as of 18:25, 13 May 2008
Should ex-felons have the right to vote? |
|
Write Subquestion here... | |
YesClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here Ex-felons tend to be poor and/or African American. A statistical study conducted in 2001 by Uggen and Manza found that 7 percent of African Americans in the United States were subjected to felony disenfranchisement laws, compared to 1 percent of all other racial groups. Therefore, laws preventing them from voting are intrinsically unfair. These laws also give an unfair advantage to the Republican party, because the poor and African Americans tend to vote Democratic. It is no surprise that most of the felon disenfranchisement laws were sponsored by Republicans. In fact, in 2003, Alabama Republican Party Chairman Marty Connors told the Washington Post: "As frank as I can be, we're opposed to [restoring voting rights] because felons don't tend to vote Republican." The study by Uggen and Manza found that, if felons had been allowed to vote in Florida in 2000, Al Gore would have won the vote in this state. Once they have completed their sentence and are no longer in prison, or on probation or parole, ex-felons have paid their debt to society, as determined by a judge. Disenfranchisement amounts to an extrajudicial punishment. Other democratic countries do not disenfranchise ex-felons.
|
NoClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here By committing a very serious crime, ex-felons have demonstrated their disrespect for the law. Therefore, they should have no input in determining who writes these laws.
|
Write Subquestion here... | |
YesClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
NoClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
Pro/con bibliography | |
YesClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9785-2004Aug17.html>.
|
NoClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
Related pages on Debatepedia: | |
|