Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Should South Korea be allowed to have nuclear weapons?

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 12:14, 19 May 2010 (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(See also)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 20:01, 17 October 2010 (edit)
Kl3661 (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 49: Line 49:
|- |-
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
-====Pro====+====Pro====
 +yes, because North Korea could threaten them with the nuclear bomb. I am from South Korea and I don't feel comfortable with North Korea possessing nuclear bombs. If we did have nuclear bombs, I know that our president wouldn't use it for a bad cause.
 + 
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''
Line 60: Line 62:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
- 
====Con==== ====Con====
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''

Revision as of 20:01, 17 October 2010

Should South Korea be allowed to have nuclear weapons?

Background and context

Although there were minor attempts for South Korea to have nuclear weapons to respond against a nuclear-armed North Korea, none of them were noticeable and met with fierce resistance about threats of war in North Korea. It seems that both the angry North Korea and the reluctant United States are unagreeable about a nuclear-armed South Korea.

Theory: Should any country be allowedto possess nuclear weapons?

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Should South Korea be allowed to have nuclear weapons to keept the aggressive North Korea in check?

Pro

yes, because North Korea could threaten them with the nuclear bomb. I am from South Korea and I don't feel comfortable with North Korea possessing nuclear bombs. If we did have nuclear bombs, I know that our president wouldn't use it for a bad cause.

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Should the U.S and other South Korea-supportive nations help South Korea to owning nuclear weapons?

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Should South Korea be allowed to respond against a nuclear-armed North Korea with equal measures(which means firing nukes)

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





See also

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.