Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Should the militia be government regulated?

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 06:31, 3 April 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Is the militia recognized in the US Second amendment intended to be government regulated and part of national security or independent and a check on state tyranny?)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 06:31, 3 April 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(External links and resources:)
Next diff →
Line 74: Line 74:
|} |}
 +
 +
 +[[Category:Underdeveloped debates]]
 +[[Category:US Constitution]]
 +[[Category:United States]]
 +[[Category:Guns]]
 +[[Category:Individual rights]]

Revision as of 06:31, 3 April 2008

Was the militia recognized in the US Second amendment intended to be government regulated and part of national security or independent and a check on state tyranny?

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Write Subquestion here...

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

Write Subquestion here...

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

Write Subquestion here...

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.