Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Social networking sites
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 00:34, 30 November 2007 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→Write Subquestion here...) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 00:37, 30 November 2007 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→No) Next diff → |
||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
====No==== | ====No==== | ||
- | *'''It is unethical for social network sites to use personal information to enable advertisers to better target you as a consumer.''' Personal information should not be used to allow companies to attempt to sell you something. | + | *'''It is unethical for social network sites to use personal information to enable advertisers to better target you as a consumer.''' Personal information should not be used for commercial purposes. It is too invasive, and can cause emotional damage. For example, what if your profile indicates that your boy friend just broke up with you, for example. An ad agency is allowed to obtain this information and use it to send you an advertisement on break-ups. This could do emotional damage. |
Revision as of 00:37, 30 November 2007
Are social networking sites generally beneficial to our world? |
Background and Context of Debate: |
Friendship: Are social networking sits benefiting friendships? | |
Yes
|
No
|
Professional networking: Do social networking sites benefit career networking? | |
Yes
|
No
|
Information: Are social networking sites a good place to exchange information? | |
Yes
|
No
|
Commercial use of info: Is the commercial use of personal information ethical? | |
Yes
|
No
|
YouTube videos pro and con. | |
Yes |
No
|
References:Related pages on Debatepedia:External links and resources: |