Personal tools
 
Views

Debatepedia:Pro/con resources section

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:14, 17 June 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (16:39, 6 June 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(link edit)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
-Every debate article should have a pro/con resources section, and this section should really be the founding section of the debate article. It presents the resources from which most arguments and supporting quotations are drawn in framing the public debate. Here is a good example of a pro/con resources section, taken from [[Debate:Turkey, EU membership]]:+Every debate article should have a pro/con resources section, and this section should really be the founding section of the debate article. It presents the resources from which most arguments and supporting quotations are drawn in framing the public debate. Here is a good example of a pro/con resources section, taken from [[Debate: Turkey EU membership]]:
{|style="font-size:100%; padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;" cellpadding="5" {|style="font-size:100%; padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;" cellpadding="5"

Current revision

Every debate article should have a pro/con resources section, and this section should really be the founding section of the debate article. It presents the resources from which most arguments and supporting quotations are drawn in framing the public debate. Here is a good example of a pro/con resources section, taken from Debate: Turkey EU membership:

Pro/con resources

Yes

No

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.