Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: College football playoffs
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: College football playoffsThe following pages link to Debate: College football playoffs:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Featured Debate Digest articles
- Editorial news and tasks
- Argument: Every game is important and exciting under BCS
- Argument: Football playoffs would not make traveling fans happy
- Argument: BCS makes much more money than playoffs could
- Argument: A 16-team college football playoff would be best
- Argument: A playoff would still maintain and co-opt bowls
- Argument: Football playoffs risks weaker teams getting lucky
- Argument: A national champion through a playoff is not important
- Argument: More teams "win" and finish season happy in BCS
- Argument: BCS is unfair to smaller teams and conferences
- Argument: Schools lose too much money to BCS businessmen
- Argument: General statements against college football playoffs
- Argument: 4-team playoff is good way to determine champs
- Argument: Playoffs are hard on football players' bodies
- Argument: Football players miss fewest classes; playoffs OK
- Debate: 4-team college football playoff
- Argument: 4-team playoff inevitably leads to bigger playoffs
- Argument: Playoffs, not computers, should determine college football champs
- Argument: Playoffs would be unfair to some college football teams
- Argument: The Bowl Championship Series is anti-competitive
- Argument: Regular season is no "playoffs" for the BCS
- Argument: 4-team college football playoffs open slippery slope to bigger playoffs
- Argument: College football playoffs benefit more schools
- Argument: Bowls give small match-ups more exposure and drama
- Argument: College football playoffs maintain importance of regular season
- Argument: BCS builds suspense of the undefeated season
- Argument: Most college football fans want a playoff
- Argument: Fan turnout would be equally strong for college football playoffs
- Argument: Fans equally willing to travel to playoffs as BCS
- Argument: College football fans can't afford playoff tickets/travel
- Argument: Co-opting bowls into playoffs would be unsuccessful
- Argument: Playoffs would generate more revenue than BCS
- Argument: Schools would make more money by hosting playoff games
- Argument: Lower-tier college football playoffs are poorly attended
- Argument: College football can evolve to include a playoff
- Argument: If BCS ain't broke, don't fix it
- Argument: Every sport has playoff, why not college football?
- Argument: Opponents of CF playoffs care about money, not academics
