Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: War on Drugs
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: War on DrugsThe following pages link to Debate: War on Drugs:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Argument: War on Drugs increases price of drugs
- Position: Denis Kucinich opposes the War on Drugs
- Debate: Legalization of drugs
- Argument: The state is justified in protecting society from drug-users
- Featured Debate Digest articles
- Editorial news and tasks
- Competitive debate schedule and topics
- Argument: War on Drugs is too ineffective to justify costs
- Argument: War on Drugs has been effective in many places
- Argument: The War on Drugs is not working
- Argument: Legalizing drugs to tax them is a perverse idea
- Argument: War on Drugs helps hold down usage
- Argument: Drug War enables governments to crack-down on cartels
- Argument: Drug War in Columbia is failing to cut drug trade
- Argument: Drug War has targeted and incarcerated far more blacks
- Argument: Costs of Drug War are greater than costs of legalization
- Argument: Higher price of illegal drugs causes more crimes by users
- Argument: Treatment cuts drug-use far better than incarceration
- Argument: War on Drugs invades privacy of Americans
- Argument: War on Drugs is a good idea even if not "winnable"
- Argument: War on Drugs perpetuates a failing policy
- Argument: Eradication-focused Drug War is counterproductive
- Argument: Enforcing drug laws would mean mass imprisonment
- Argument: War on Drugs worsens cartel violence
- Argument: More people die from Drug War than overdosing
- Argument: War on Drugs cannot be won; drugs will always exist
- Argument: Harm reduction is better approach than War on Drugs
- Argument: Most try drugs only a handful of times; little harm
- Argument: Harm reduction drug policies work in many countries
- Argument: War on Drugs is overly punitive and draconian
- Argument: Drug War increases drug prices, increasing drug-related crime
- Argument: War on Drugs restricts clean needle access, worsens diseases
- Argument: Legalizing drugs would improve quality control
- Argument: War on Drugs keeps drug trade profitable
- Argument: War on Drugs keeps drug trade profitable, lures children in
- Argument: War on Drugs is perceived as a war on citizens
- Argument: War on Drugs imprisons too many people
- Argument: Drug prohibition does not correlate with decreased use
- Argument: Legalizing drugs is the least bad option
- Argument: Drugs are very harmful; War on Drugs is justified
- Argument: Drugs fund terrorists; War on Drugs is justified
- Argument: War on Drugs helps combat drug-related crimes
- Argument: War on Drugs works well in concert with other programs
- Argument: War on Drugs sends clear message that drugs are bad
- Argument: Individuals are at liberty to take drugs, harm themselves
- Argument: State should not regulate spiritual interest in drugs
- Argument: State should not regulate belief in creative value of drugs
- Argument: War on Drugs wrongly stigmatizes drug-users
- Argument: War on Drugs is simply too expensive
- Argument: War on Drugs destroys local suppliers, gives cartels monopoly
