Personal tools

User talk:England4ever

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 09:35, 26 July 2011; England4ever (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Useless "work" about the communism page

Whoever wrote the page about communism has no knowledge on the subject, and Whatever was taken away was just going to mislead people and give them wrong ideas about communism. would you rather have a wrong page or an incomplete page about communism?


Really good edits England4ever. Been them over via recent changes. Have a look at the upcoming features page (link in the navigation section) for some of the articles that are a priority that are underdeveloped, and which we may host on the Debate Digest. Anyway, welcome! - Brooks Lindsay (Talk) 12:16, 21 March 2011 (EDT)


...communications with the editor that had worked on the Messianic Judaism article with a bias. Well done. -- Brooks Lindsay (Talk) 21:50, 8 May 2011 (EDT)

How would one link prophecy to divine knowledge.

I would appreciate feedback on the tone of my responses in the debate. I don't know who the contributors are and such knowledge is irrelevant to the arguments. Thank you for engaging me in the debate. Robust debate on such topics is hard to find.

How would one go about connecting any prophecy to a supernatural being? Edgar Cayce and Nostradamus were both known to practice divination. This is something that has always puzzled me about these things. Their believers count just as many 'hits' as bible believers do. How do you know that it came from God and not the intestines of a goat? These are serious flaws in the argument. Cheers. --Adam F in MO 17:33, 21 May 2011 (EDT)


You should delete that argument. It doesn't make sense. I certainly didn't write it.

Yes, I'm the founder and editor of DP, so a good "official" source to come to with questions like this. However, if any argument is clearly fallacious, it can be deleted, as long as you provide an explanation.

Anyway, keep up the hard work! Really love having you around and following your edits on Recent Changes. -- Brooks Lindsay (Talk) 00:10, 9 June 2011 (EDT)


Yeah, have to use a heavy hand with vandalism. Yeah, looks like I slightly missed the reference to your work. All good though. Anyway, love your contributions to the site. Glad you like being here. I'm quite addicted to it as well! :) - Brooks Lindsay (Talk) 17:12, 15 June 2011 (EDT)


Yeah, I'm looking into more advanced solutions. May be a bot... Thanks for raising concern... best, - Brooks Lindsay (Talk) 16:57, 15 July 2011 (EDT)

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits